Ninety days. That’s roughly a single budget quarter, and often just enough time to prove whether a data strategy is real or merely a slide deck. For executives, this window isn’t about perfection. It’s about building momentum: setting clear priorities, fixing the most critical data issues, and delivering quick wins that earn trust for deeper transformation.
Most enterprises already drown in data, and their problem isn’t volume but focus.
A 90-day plan forces leaders to concentrate on a few high-impact decisions and the data that truly supports them. New leaders are often judged by what they achieve in their first three months, and the same is true for a data strategy.
Organizations rarely fail for lack of dashboards; they fail because ownership, priorities, and governance aren’t clarified early enough. The first quarter is the moment to set that tone.
The First Quarter Test: Why 90 Days Matter More Than a Yearly Roadmap
Show me your first quarter, and I’ll tell you how the year will go. This saying is truer for data strategies than for almost anything else. A 12-month roadmap can look flawless in a presentation, but if the first three months don’t establish priorities, governance, and credibility, the rest of the plan usually stalls.
The reason is simple: leaders and teams judge progress by visible change.
Without a few early wins – a trusted dashboard replacing spreadsheets in one key process, a cleaned-up customer dataset for a critical campaign – enthusiasm fades.
Firms like Elvitix, who often advise large organizations in their first steps, stress that the first quarter isn’t about scale. It’s about setting a direction and proving that the organization can act on its own data.
Week 1-4: Setting the Ground Rules and Picking the Right Battles
The first month is often the most political.
Everyone has their own definition of “priority” and their own version of the truth hidden in reports.
The smart move is to spend these first four weeks drawing boundaries and making choices:
- Agree on two or three business questions that, if answered with reliable data, would deliver immediate value.
- Appoint accountable data owners for each of those domains.
- Clarify decision rights – who approves new metrics, who signs off definitions, who decides when a dataset is “fit for purpose.”
A surprising pattern observed by teams such as Elvitix is that most early disputes aren’t about technology but about who owns which numbers. Resolving that early prevents months of hidden friction later.
Week 5-8: Cleaning Up the Core Data to Enable Quick Wins
This is the part many executives underestimate.
A clean customer master file, a reconciled product catalog, a single source of truth for revenue – these rarely exist in a neat state.
The focus of weeks five to eight is on removing the biggest sources of doubt:
- Fix the most error-prone datasets first (customer records, product hierarchies, financial transactions).
- Establish automated quality checks and simple lineage tracking.
- Close obvious gaps in accessibility so analysts don’t spend half their time hunting for data.
The fastest cultural shift often comes not from a new tool but from the first reliable metric everyone trusts. Advisory partners like Elvitix have repeatedly seen that a few targeted clean-ups here unlock far more value than rolling out yet another dashboard.
Week 9-12: Turning Insights into Action and Building Trust
Momentum matters.
By the third month, the organisation needs to see that the investment is not just in plumbing but in decisions.
Choose one or two of the earlier business questions and close the loop:
- Publish a metric that guides a real decision – for example, churn risk for top customer segments.
- Use that metric to adjust a campaign or re-allocate budget.
- Share the outcome quickly to show that better data changes behaviour.
Trust builds when leaders act on the same evidence that their teams see. The first quarter should end with a few small but visible stories of action, not just with a new data warehouse diagram.
Common Pitfalls That Derail the First 90 Days – and How to Avoid Them
The first quarter often sets the tone for the entire data journey. Yet many leaders stumble not because of technology, but because of basic execution missteps. Recognising these early can save months of lost momentum.
Key pitfalls to watch out for:
- Trying to fix everything at once.
Ambitious leaders often launch too many parallel initiatives. The result: diluted focus and delayed visible wins that erode confidence. - Ignoring ownership disputes.
When two departments can’t agree on “the right number,” no platform or dashboard will help. Clarifying who owns which data is fundamental. - Chasing perfect architecture too soon.
Early credibility comes from solving a few concrete problems, not from building an ultimate platform that may never be fully adopted. - Under-communicating progress.
If stakeholders don’t see evidence of results, they assume there is none – even if the team is making steady progress behind the scenes.
Avoiding these traps keeps the spotlight where it belongs: on tangible outcomes and momentum, rather than on tools or technology debates. Leaders who get this right turn the first 90 days into proof that change is both possible and valuable.
Beyond Day 90: Keeping Momentum Alive for Long-Term Change
The end of the first quarter is not the finish line – it’s the proof-of-concept for the culture you want.
To keep the momentum:
- Continue prioritising by business value, not by departmental influence.
- Formalise data governance gradually, expanding ownership and accountability as the number of use cases grows.
- Invest in skills – analysts, engineers, product owners – so that new insights can be acted on without bottlenecks.
The organisations that sustain progress treat the first 90 days as the foundation of a longer journey. They use early credibility to secure further investment and keep the focus on turning data into decisions.
Source link
